|
The
case developed out of all proportions, it was filed in court on
11th December 2006, and after lengthy reading of
bundle 1 (300 pages) of two, it was served on the defendant on
about 6th February 2007, The PCN was cancelled, but
this was rejected by the claimant, to order the defendant to
come to court and prove its legitimacy while the
harassment
case is now sub judice. The claim is for breaches under 15
statutes, and shall all be placed here in due course. Tue, 13
Mar 2007 19:59:17 last posted comment.
|
|
The
key focus of this dispute commenced the day the PCN was issued
for a remarkably prejudicial timing of 60 seconds.
A previous
on with Islington was for 3.3 seconds, and Transport for London
two minutes.
In the past 5 years I have not received a
penalty for anything serious. I don't consider 3.3 seconds to 2
minutes as
remotely serious, it is closer to criminal,
especially with a disabled badge on display at all times.
The
result of each complaint was that I disputed the manner of such
conduct as inhuman, prejudicial, neglect of duty of
care
under totrt law, a derogation of my rights under the EU
conventions for human rights, Protocol 5 articles 1-15,
and
vexing to a degree that the conduct in each case was
regarded by myself as pursuing a course of conduct that
rendered
the culpable parties, and directing minds actionable
under the offence of Harassment 1997, section 40.
In the case
of Islington, a representation was made to the LGO and they
found the local council guilty of
maladministration.
Transport
for London was an amalgam of 6 separate breaches of the RTA 1991
that made them guilty of knowingly
attempting to enforce an
invalid PCN contrary to several statutes.
Lastly Camden, the
leader this kind of conduct, made the PCN a matter of
enforcement on an issue of, in my view very
personal
prejudice.
I have in my possession exhibits to be revealed at
the appropriate time showing how they willfully and knowingly
were
lenient for some PCN's , that were identically
enforceable with my own,on circumstances of far greater
temporal
measure in offence than my own. They cancelled those
and chose arbitrarily to enforce mine.
They shall be
exposed,and on issuance of an NTO have been given formal notice
of an action for harassment.
This part of the site has
commenced deposition at the above date, and should be completed
within a 24 to 72 hours.
Please bear with me for the further
exhibits to be knitted together with this synopsis.
Text
extracts from Camden and their solicitors are shown for ease of
reading as text, the scanned images will be
deposed shortly
after, to show they derive from the originals.
|
|
* Culpability
as
the
function of anticipation and expectation.
* Syllogistic
reasoning with either the classic major & minor premises or
implied premises.
* The three laws of thought that render
judgments irrefutable in any time, world or space.
* Their
corresponding verification using matrix truth tables in the
calculus of logic.
* Judgments of subsumption and
comparison.
* Scientific Methodology and its substrate of
necessary and sufficient conditions in nomic relationships.
*
Venn Diagrams and class concepts.
* Frege's 'Sense and
Reference', and Russel's 'On Denoting'.
* Newtons 1st
law
of motion upgraded with the teleology of goal seeking entities,
and observations of their employment in what is best described
as the function of a goal and the critical path being followed
in a course of conduct, that includes the management of
personnel on a 'need to know' basis and precision manipulation
to permit the parties coming to the front and stating truthfully
they are 'NOT AWARE'.
* Widespread use of economy of truth,
and false emphasis in the art of 'suppression veri' and
'suggestio falsi'.
* Cloaking assertions in the aforesaid
economies of truth, and providing the context that gives them
credibility and authority that is fallacious.
* Classic
fallacies, plus a new set of fallacies of conduct observed in
widespread use, and underpinning 'spin'.
References
are also made to Heraclitus, theory of flux, Plato's forms, and
Aristotle's laws of thought, where the chrono topology of the
laws of thought is set outside the framework.
* And the more
objective correspondence theory that is intuitive in
Aristotle's definition of Truth as opposed to Russell's that is
more subjective.
* Unambiguous and unequivocal contextual
inferencing, a discipline that is not as far as the author can
see,
used widely if at all.
It has its complexities and
relies on aggregates of conjunctive and disjunctive
propositions. Probably this is the more difficult to
understand, but is was many times, and in a cause in action
twice, to absolute precision in a determination, and
established as very reliable at a high level in the balance of
probabilities. Where possible, these will be explained in short
sentences that give greater insight.
The academia for these
expositions are not required by the reader at all, they are
stated as references, and will be referred to very briefly.
While this all sounds perhaps somewhat pretentious, I shall
depose two sentences that are exemplary of two of the
disciplines in use here, to show they are most certainly not
mere abstractions but that civilisation as we know it relies on
them entirely for their efficacy and pragmatic reliability.
TWO
disciplines.
1.
Scientific methodology and the use of necessary and sufficient
conditions.
Sufficient
and necessary conditions.
Best
expressed as a conditional, easily understood in this simplest
of unqualified example.
IF
there is one simple condition, or nomic relationship for the
existence of life, THEN,
the
presence of oxygen is necessary
for life, if and only if the
absence of oxygen is sufficient
for the absence of life.
If
there are more conditions, then substitute water for oxygen in
the above and you have two conditions or causes.
If
there are more, one may substitute vitamin D, and observe what
happens and discover that where it is absent then rickets
occurs and where present it does not, so that has determined a
cause of rickets, but not life. These principles are behind
medical aetiologies, and all nomic or causal relationships.
2.
Truth and correspondence, theory much easier.
”To
say of what is
that
it is
not,
or
of
what is
not
that
it is,
is false,
while
to say of what is
that it
is, or
of what is
not that it
is not, is
true.”
|
